Supplement Brand SEO — Before & After

Four-tool SEO proof for Biotek Farmasi.

Paired source reports show Rank Math moving from 66 to 98, Seobility from 58% to 100%, SEO Site Checkup from 66 to 82, and SEOptimer from C to B.

Technical SEOOn-PageSchema

AFTER RESULT98/100

Rank Math SEO Audit

IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY

Rank Math66 → 98 +32

Seobility58% → 100% +42%

Site Checkup66 → 82 +16

SEOptimerC → B ↑

paired audits improved
across the optimisation pass

Scope: Supplement brand website
Evidence runs: Baseline → Optimised
Primary gain: Rank Math 66→98
Supporting gain: Seobility 58%→100%

The scorecard

Four paired reports. One transparent gap.

Four supplied tools are paired. Google PageSpeed was captured separately on mobile, so it is shown as a current snapshot rather than a before-and-after result.

Baseline 15 Aug 2026

Rank Math66/10018 passed · 7 failed

Seobility58%Page quality 48% · links 0%

SEO Site Checkup66/10042 passed · 17 failed

SEOptimerC22 recommendations · links F

PageSpeed—No before report supplied

Optimised 16 Aug 2026

Rank Math98/100+3227 passed · 1 failed

Seobility100%+42%Structure & links 100%

SEO Site Checkup82/100+1649 passed · 11 failed

SEOptimerB↑ grade15 recommendations · links F

PageSpeed93/100Mobile · desktop unavailable

01 / Overview

Clearer crawlable signals, validated by separate tools.

Biotek Farmasi is a supplement brand website with product, ingredient, and purchase-oriented content.

The paired reports document changes to the homepage's technical and on-page signals: canonical control, heading structure, metadata, internal links, structured data, language, and sitemap discovery. The report results differ in scope, so this page treats each score as tool-specific evidence—not as one averaged metric.

0166→98

Rank Math passed tests increased from 18 of 28 to 27 of 28, with failed checks down from seven to one.

0258%→100%

Seobility reached a 100% SEO score, including 100% page structure and link structure.

0366→82

SEO Site Checkup increased by 16 points while failed checks fell from 17 to 11.

04C→B

SEOptimer rose one grade and its recommendation count fell from 22 to 15.

02 / What changed

Foundational signals were made explicit.

Canonical URL was added

The baseline checks could not find a canonical URL. The later Rank Math and Seobility reports detect a valid canonical for the homepage.

Canonicalisation

Headings and copy became crawlable

The later audit detects one H1, multiple H2s, 283 words, and internal links—signals that were missing or inconsistent in the baseline reports.

Content structure

Metadata became more descriptive

The title changed from 45 to 55 characters and the description from 76 to 143 characters, while both later reports recognise the intended product context.

On-page SEO

Link structure was established

Seobility moved from zero detected links to 15 internal and one external link, with link structure reported at 100%.

Internal linking

Structured context was reviewed

Baseline reports listed schema and sitemap gaps. The later reports show fewer remaining technical issues, but residual warnings stay visible in the source files.

Schema · sitemap

Remaining work is still visible

Links remain graded F in SEOptimer, while performance and off-page recommendations continue. The score rise is not presented as a finished SEO programme.

Evidence practice

03 / Evidence

Each paired result is retained.

The table provides the comparison; every PDF below opens the original report.

Tool	Baseline	Optimised	Change
Rank Math	66/100 · 18 passed	98/100 · 27 passed	+32
Seobility	58% · links 0%	100% · links 100%	+42%
SEO Site Checkup	66/100 · 17 failed	82/100 · 11 failed	+16
SEOptimer	C · 22 recommendations	B · 15 recommendations	↑ grade
PageSpeed	No before report	93/100 mobile · desktop unavailable	Current snapshot

04 / Limitations

What the score changes do not prove.

No ranking or sales claim

The reports verify automated checklist changes, not higher organic rankings, more visitors, sales, or product outcomes.

No PageSpeed comparison

A mobile result of 93/100 is captured, but no before result exists and the desktop run returned no score. It is shown as a current snapshot, not a performance gain.

Links remain an open issue

SEOptimer still grades links F. The on-page and technical gains do not establish off-page authority.

Some issues remain

The later Site Checkup report still lists 11 issues and SEOptimer retains 15 recommendations. The work is improved, not presented as complete.

05 / Source reports

Eight supplied files, paired by tool.

Open any report to inspect the full source behind the comparison.

Live · Mobile only

Next project

Explore the growing SEO portfolio.

View every project

Four-tool SEO proof for Biotek Farmasi.

Four paired reports. One transparent gap.

Clearer crawlable signals, validated by separate tools.

Foundational signals were made explicit.

Canonical URL was added

Headings and copy became crawlable

Metadata became more descriptive

Link structure was established

Structured context was reviewed

Remaining work is still visible

Each paired result is retained.

What the score changes do not prove.

No ranking or sales claim

No PageSpeed comparison

Links remain an open issue

Some issues remain

Eight supplied files, paired by tool.

Google PageSpeed

Rank Math — Baseline

Rank Math — Optimised

Seobility — Baseline

Seobility — Optimised

SEO Site Checkup — Baseline

SEO Site Checkup — Optimised

SEOptimer — Baseline

SEOptimer — Optimised

Explore the growing SEO portfolio.