Rank Math passed checks rose from 19 of 28 to 25 of 28, with failed checks down from six to two.
Yoga Studio SEO — Before & After
Four-tool SEO proof for Liemoro.
Paired source reports show Rank Math moving from 65 to 89, Seobility from 67% to 84%, SEO Site Checkup from 84 to 89, and SEOptimer from C+ to B.
Rank Math SEO Audit
- Scope
- Yoga studio website
- Evidence runs
- Baseline → Optimised
- Primary gain
- Rank Math 65→89
- Supporting gain
- Seobility 67%→84%
The scorecard
Four paired reports. One live performance check.
Four supplied tools are paired. PageSpeed was run separately after the audit set, with both mobile and desktop results shown below.
01 / Overview
Content and crawlable structure became visible to the audit tools.
Liemoro is a yoga studio website focused on vinyasa, breathwork, yin yoga, and yoga nidra.
The paired reports document a homepage that changed from a thin, nearly linkless page into a fuller page with an explicit heading structure, substantial copy, internal navigation, a stronger search title and description, and richer social metadata.
Seobility recorded richer page quality and link structure, with 1,047 words and 19 internal links in the later run.
SEO Site Checkup improved by five points while failed checks fell from ten to six.
SEOptimer rose one grade and reduced its recommendation count from 22 to 20.
02 / What changed
Core on-page signals were added and connected.
Heading structure was added
The baseline reports flagged no H1 and no H2 headings. The later reports detect one H1 and multiple H2 sections.
Content hierarchyUseful page content expanded
Seobility moved from zero detected words to 1,047 words, giving search engines more crawlable context for the studio.
On-page contentInternal navigation became crawlable
The later Seobility report lists 19 internal links where the baseline had none, improving route discovery and link structure.
Internal linkingSearch snippets were strengthened
The title expanded from 31 to 53 characters and the description from 108 to 146 characters in the source reports.
MetadataSocial context was improved
The later reports record Open Graph and Twitter image metadata alongside an updated description and canonical URL.
Sharing metadataRemaining work stays visible
The latest reports still identify issues such as H1 review, links, analytics, and performance work. This is an improved state, not a finished programme.
Evidence practice03 / Evidence
Each paired result is retained.
The table gives the comparison; every PDF below opens the original report.
| Tool | Baseline | Optimised | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank Math | 65/100 · 19 passed | 89/100 · 25 passed | +24 |
| Seobility | 67% · 0 words · links 0% | 84% · 1,047 words · links 72% | +17% |
| SEO Site Checkup | 84/100 · 10 failed | 89/100 · 6 failed | +5 |
| SEOptimer | C+ · 22 recommendations | B · 20 recommendations | ↑ grade |
| PageSpeed | No source report | Mobile 88 · desktop 99 | Standalone current run |
04 / Limitations
What the score changes do not prove.
No ranking or booking claim
The reports verify automated checklist changes, not higher organic rankings, visitor growth, class bookings, or revenue.
One current PageSpeed run
Google PageSpeed Insights was run separately after the supplied audit set: mobile scored 88/100 and desktop scored 99/100. No baseline PageSpeed run is claimed.
Links remain an open issue
SEOptimer still grades links F. The stronger internal-link signal does not establish off-page authority.
Some issues remain
The later reports still list six failed Site Checkup checks and 20 SEOptimer recommendations. The work is improved, not presented as complete.
05 / Source reports
Eight supplied files, paired by tool.
Open any report to inspect the full source behind the comparison.
Rank Math — Baseline
65/100 · 19 passed · 6 failed
Open report → PDF · OptimisedRank Math — Optimised
89/100 · 25 passed · 2 failed
Open report → PDF · BaselineSeobility — Baseline
67% SEO score · links 0%
Open report → PDF · OptimisedSeobility — Optimised
84% SEO score · 19 internal links
Open report → PDF · BaselineSEO Site Checkup — Baseline
84/100 · 50 passed · 10 failed
Open report → PDF · OptimisedSEO Site Checkup — Optimised
89/100 · 53 passed · 6 failed
Open report → PDF · BaselineSEOptimer — Baseline
C+ overall · 22 recommendations
Open report → PDF · OptimisedSEOptimer — Optimised
B overall · 20 recommendations
Open report →